-
Website
http://thinkvitamin.com -
Original page
http://thinkvitamin.com/features/top-web-designers-to-follow-on-twitter/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
John Griffiths
2 comments · 1 points
-
Bryan Veloso
3 comments · 1 points
-
Douglas Neiner
2 comments · 2 points
-
puppylove81
2 comments · 1 points
-
GridIron
2 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
;)
(Okay, okay, now following you...). I can't comment much on j-pop, but I once liked Utada Hikaru. That was years ago though ;)
And why don't you add a post on "Top SEOs to follow in twitter"?
I extremely thankful you kept the size and quality of this list within reason. Heaven forbid you make a 100+ list and fill it with the dozens of "web developers" that just retweet everything and auto-follow everyone.
Yes, I just cleaned out about 100+ web design people from my following list so I know what I talking about. Haha.
Thanks again.
@creativeworld
http://twitter.com/creativeworld
I too shy away from users that seem to have an invisible brick wall up when it comes to @replies. I can say with confidence, at least for anybody that ever wants to ask me anything (might not be many, but yes, anything), that if you @reply me, 4 times out of 5 I'll reply back.
That's probably the reason why my tweet count is so inflated. :)
Only thing I would say is a future list would benefit from having a short summary under each name. Maybe explaining where they work or why they are so well known.
Realise that's a bit more work of course : ) but just a thought.
Cheers
Dennis
thanks for the post
Similarly, the high number of entrants also smacks of appealing to the designers' egos.
Further to the appealing point, you then proceeded to "@username you're on the list lol" most of them on Twitter to notify them that they had been listed in this. It's brown-nosing, plain and simple.
Back-slapping comes into the fact that there are almost no "unknowns", who might be able to provide more value for their followers than already famous people with no time for the more personal approach that can be valuable over Twitter. This has been mentioned in other comments on this very page.
I'd say we put several 'up-and-coming' designers on the list actually. However, the whole point of the list is that these are the big names that are shaping the industry. They're *supposed* to be well known.
The reason why the list is growing is because I'm not omniscient. I didn't think of everyone when I posted it and I fully expected people to point new people out to me, which have been added to the list.
Bradley - instead of complaining, why don't you put together your own list? I'm tired of you spouting negativity (which you have often done both on this blog and Carsonified) without ever offering a solution.
You gotta resist the temptation to engage with them and only offer the silence that their useless provocation deserves.
On topic though, thanks for the list. It would be great to see yoru pick of digital marketers who twitter in a future post.
> own list?
Because comments are for feedback on articles (as said in the page above this), and I have provided feedback.
Additionally, if I put together my own list, no-one would read it as no-one follows my "blog" or Twitter account. I'd rather try and improve the more public appearances of this kind of information than dilute the waters by adding extra noise on other sites.
And why is the onus on me to "(offer) a solution"? I'm not famous or well-known enough (except perhaps as a troll) to actually make a difference - I'm just a member of the same community as the rest of us who happens to be critical of fluff.
If you'd like constructive feedback (aka part of a solution), here's some: how about when you make your next list like this you provide a *reason* why these people belong here, rather than just listing them? This article (and the one previous) are essentially blog rolls with a wider audience. I'd like to see some real *writing* on this topic: why are they visionary? Why should we follow them? If we don't know them, what have they done we might know? That's the kind of article I expect on thinkvitamin - actual content.
"And why is the onus on me to "(offer) a solution"?" Simple: because communities pitch in together to find solutions. If you're not contributing to the community, then you're not a part of it.
You're what Caius Durling so kindly coined, a Soapbox Troll.
My point about content still stands - this article is particularly short on it, and I'd prefer to see something useful in my feedreader. I'll unsubscribe from ThinkVitamin, since it clearly just causes me to make inflammatory comments.
Carson doesn't mention why any of the above mentioned are worth following and some of the above mentioned are actually not that active on Twitter at all and provide no professional insight -- mostly personal.
Carson just listed "hey, here are really cool people and their Twitter accounts" -- not much of an article to me. The "what" is easy, but where is the "why" or the "how" you got to this list?
I think the overwhelming Twitter plug on this is what is making me more and more agree with Bradley.
What makes them worthy contributors to Twitter? The fact they're pseudo-famous web designers or the insightful commentary they provide on Twitter? I've previously followed and then subsequently unfollowed a few people from this list because whilst they might be good conference speakers or talented in their field, they don't necessarily say anything interesting (or sometimes, quite the opposite) on Twitter.
Bradley's suggestion (sans the bitterness) is a good one, considering a brief description of each person would be nice... but we all should be web savvy enough to research each of these persons and decide who we'd be best served following on Twitter.
Thanks for the list, Ryan! (not to brown-nose or anything!) Cheers!
Great list.
Regards,
@toddlibby
There does need to be some context for why these people are so essential to follow, I appreciate the obviousness of choosing well-known web designers, but a lot of them say very little about web design. Sure, follow them if they're interesting or funny, but if they're not saying a lot about the web should they really be on this list?
I would say that out of all the web designers people I follow, Matt Wilcox (twitter.com/mattwilcox) is the most valuable (despite his endless rants) because he is pretty much singlehandedly pushing forward the best ideas about how CSS and HTML could be improved and why they're not good enough as they are.
Apologies for the constant tweeting earlier today. I actually only tweeted around seven people, then realized it was annoying for all my followers - so promptly stopped.
I'll check out Matt Wilcox - sounds very interesting.
Best,
Ryan
I am Essai Selvan, Just found you from twitter.
Find in twitter @EssaiSelvan (http://twitter.com/EssaiSelvan )
This list may be lame. But using the comments below this post to promote your own sorry ass that didn't make it to this list is taking lameness to a whole new level.
@strexy
:)
Great designer, terribly misguided character.
http://www.twitter.com/jianart
I'm a creative web designer.
Thanks.
Chris
Djembe Drums
I know their are people who thought like me and then got addicted to the whole thing, Im guessing I wont be one of them.
Just added everyone on the list.
You can add me at http://www.twitter.com/garethdaine
UK Web Hosting
Tony
IM Niche Formula
Those are sure good inspiration to follow.
:)
Josh Hemsley - http://www.twitter.com/joshhemsley
:)
Nice list Ryan!